Shouldn't Trafficking in Pollution be an Option for All?   
Click for Hypocrisy and Secondhand Smoke

Excerpt from
"Closing Will free up emission 'credits' "
by ANDREW MELNYKOVYCH
Monday March 1st 1999
"If there is good news in the closing of the Phillip Morris cigarette plant in Louisville, it is that in the short term, it will mean cleaner air.
That's because Phillip Morris is one of Jefferson County's largest sources of smog-forming pollution.
In the longer term, the plant closing could help efforts to attract new industry, expand existing plants or even give owners of new cars a break from vehicle emissions testing."
Richard Lewis makes an offer to purchase sufficient pollution credits from Phillip Morris to offset his 1988 Ford Ranger's failure to pass the Jefferson County Vehicle Emissions Test.         March 9, 1999
Annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for an Average Vehicle
When our United States Constitution was adopted on March 4, 1789 it's guarantees applied only to U.S. Citizens "living beings" guarantees did not apply to corporations.
     It was not until 1886, ninety-seven years after the U.S. Constitution was adopted that the Supreme Court decreed, without hearing arguments, that "corporations" would have the same rights as a person.

see pgs.347-359 Who Will Tell The People by William Greider paperback 1992
Corporations were granted the same rights and not superior rights.  American Law is classles: equal and for all.
Tradable CO2 Emissions Permits Problems with the Perfect Solution
by Barbara Rippel, policy analyst

A study prepared for the National Consumer Coalition
under the auspices of Consumer Alert
November 25, 1997

4. Domestic Distribution

After the decision has been made about the level of emissions, the next step is to decide how the permits or allowances should be allocated among companies. Initially it must be established which companies should be involved in the trading scheme. The inclusion of primary energy producers and primary energy importers would seem to be a more practical way rather than including all companies that emit CO2 or even individual households. Although it seems impossible to include consumers in a permit system, it appears the idea is not totally dismissed, at least in theoretical discussions in the Administration, according to a report of the Electricity Daily, November 14, 1997.(7)

7. "Clinton Plans Permits to Ration Fossil Fuels," in The Electricity Daily, November 14, 1997, Vol. 9, No. 95

Since the number of companies that emit CO2 is extremely high --not to mention the number of households-- their inclusion would make monitoring impossible. Also energy rationing does not seem particularly popular with voters in industrial countries and elsewhere.

Accelerated Vehicle Retirement Programs Can Improve Air Quality Chevron Corporation. In Southern California, Chevron Corporation is purchasing and dismantling 4,200 pre-1975 model-year cars under California's Rule 1610, which awards mobile source emissions credits to stationary source polluters that operate scrapping programs. Chevron plans to use the credits to forestall required installation of vapor-recovery technology at one of its off-shore oil terminals. [ 266 ]

Hypocrisy and Seconhand Smoke
Same Gases traded as Pollution Credits

Environmental Tobacco SmokeEPA's Report
Environmental Tobacco Smoke: EPA's Report by Carol M. Browner
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), also termed secondhand smoke, harms the health of thousands of Americans each year. ETS is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of cigarettes, pipes, or cigars, and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. This mixture contains over 4,000 substances. More than 40 of these are known to cause cancer in humans and animals, and many are strong respiratory irritants.

Exposure to secondhand smoke, called involuntary smoking or passive smoking, is concentrated indoors, where ETS is often the most significant pollutant. Indoor levels of the particles you may inhale (the "tars" in the cigarettes) from ETS often exceed the national air quality standard established by EPA for outdoor air. The high levels of carbon monoxide in secondhand smoke also warrant concern.

Ontario Hydro earns half a million on sale of pollution credit TORONTO (CP) _ Ontario Hydro earned nearly $500,000 by selling pollution reduction credits to a Connecticut company that needed them to satisfy state regulatory orders to improve air quality.

Trading of emission credits allows pollution cuts achieved by one company to be purchased by another to help comply with state environmental requirements. The practice is attractive for many companies because it allows pollution cuts to be achieved at lower costs than by having each individual company cut emissions from its own facilities.

asmok
HCMA takes part in anti-smoking coalition
As part of the statewide coalition MATCH (Mobilize Against Tobacco for Children’s Health), the Hartford County Medical Association, along with 44 Connecticut organizations committed to anti-smoking efforts, is sponsoring a program called "Healthy Homes," designed to educate residents about the dangers of second-hand smoke and to urge people to make their homes smoke-free.

"With every study, we are learning more and more about the dangers of second-hand smoke," said Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, a member of the coalition. "Even if you don’t buy a pack of cigarettes or smoke a cigarette, you are affected if you are exposed to second-hand smoke."

NCPA - Environmental Issues

Would Emissions Trading Lower Costs Of Kyoto Agreement? 
Emissions permit trading is frequently cited as a "costless" way to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under international agreements on global climate change. Under such a program, the government would specify a target level of emissions; companies would be given permits to emit CO2 based on historical output; and they could sell any unused permits to other producers.

   
Pollution charges 'Pricing for Pollution', by Wilfred Beckerman (second edition published as Hobart Paper 66, by the Institute of Economic Affairs, 2 Lord North Street, London SW1P 3LB, tel 071 799 3745; fax 071 799 2137, L4-95 plus 50p p&p).

Dr Wilfred Beckerman of Balliol College, Oxford, has argued in print since 1956 that pollution is better controlled by charging for it through pollution taxes or marketable 'rights to pollute' than by regulating it. He notes that the world's politicians are beginning to catch up with him, giving the example of Sweden, where the use of pollution charges is most advanced, and the States, where Bush introduced a programme of 'emission reduction credits',with a market in such rights, to combat air pollution.
'Pollution is better controlled by charging for it through pollution taxes or marketable 'rights to pollute' than by regulating it'

Note these are two separate links. 
The AirBank
Excerpt to the right is from   Press Release

February 10, 1997
New Jersey Company Trades Air Emission Credits

The AirBank (Innovative Compliance Solutions, LLC ) has recently completed New Jersey’s first two successful air emission credit trades under the state’s Open Market Emissions Trading Rule (OMET). This innovative environmental regulation, adopted by the DEP last summer, allows New Jersey companies to buy and sell emission "credits" to achieve the state’s tough air quality standards.

Companies which control their air pollution emissions to below required limits can sell the resulting savings to other firms in the state. The regulations require that ten percent of the credits involved in each trade be "retired", in order to guarantee an added benefit to the environment.

According to Thomas Hopper, AirBank General Manager, "New Jersey’s new air emissions trading rule is expected to help the state achieve the ozone-related requirements of the Clean Air Act faster and more efficiently than in the past."